If you watched the Rio Olympics
you may have noticed how much
variation there is in the human smile.
Most people look better smiling.
But some people look worse.
And some people just plain have “it.”
Simone Manuel, the first African American
woman to win a gold medal in swimming
is an example of a smile changing her entire
being. Seemingly a very serious person,
when she finally smiled she
lit up the world.
Michael Phelps seems to have no
middle ground between a huge, toothy
smile and almost maniacal intensity.
Then there are the half smiles.
Half smiles are really hard
to pull off. Maybe that’s
why models get paid so much
or why the Mona Lisa is so
riveting.
Let’s face it, we don’t really gravitate
towards people who rarely smile.
But then again, we don't really trust
people who smile all the time.
How many times have we seen
speakers go up to a podium and say,
“I’m so happy to be here”
but look like they are attending a wake?
Would a fake smile be better in that instance?
Probably.
It actually depends on how
far away your audience is.
If they are really close to you
that would be tough.
So, if you’re giving a speech
the key is to do what the actors do:
build a couple of moments
into your speech where
you are guaranteed to emit a real smile.
This can take some doing.
President Obama has one heck of a smile.
But is it always real?
That’s debatable.
Once in a while you catch
him faking it. He suddenly smiles
when he knows the cameras are rolling.
It’s hard to be always “on.”
Hillary Clinton’s smile is very variable.
Most of the time it looks fake.
But she does have a very real laugh.
The Donald’s teeth are blinding
so it’s really hard to tell what’s real.
Bernie, on the other hand,
looks best not smiling.
A genuine smile doesn’t
strike like lightning.
It doesn’t happen by chance
unless you’re Bill Clinton or Pat Buchanan
(one is amusing to many,
the other at least amuses himself.)
In physiology, a smile
is a facial expression formed
by flexing muscles most notably
near both ends of the mouth
but also around the eyes.
You can fake the mouth part,
but faking smiling eyes is really hard.
Actors train for years to be able to
deliver a “real” smile on cue.
Most of them end up using sense
memory to put them in a remembered
place where they really did smile.
It is a disconnect between the eyes
and the mouth that usually
betrays an imposter.
If you covered Donald Trump’s
or Hillary Clinton’s mouth
would you know that they were
smiling if you only had their eyes to go by?
Rudy Giuliani, on the other hand,
seems to have it down.
He’s not the most handsome guy
on the planet but when
he chooses to smile his eyes twinkle.
It really does seem real, doesn’t it?
Researchers have identified a
number of different types of smiles.
The two that predominate are
the “Duchenne Smile” and the
“Pan American Smile.”
The Duchenne Smile,
named after the researcher
Guillaume Duchenne
is the most studied and involves
the movement of both
the zygomaticus major muscle
near the mouth
and the orbicularis oculi muscle
near the eyes.
It’s believed that the Duchenne smile
is only produced as an involuntary response
to genuine emotion.
It’s considered the “genuine smile.”
Due to the involvement
of the muscle near the eyes,
it’s believed that you can tell whether
or not a smile is real by whether or not
it reaches the eyes.
The “Pan American Smile,”
on the other hand,
is the voluntary smile involving only
the zygomaticus major muscle
to show politeness.
It was named after a stewardess
on the now defunct airline
Pan Am.
Considered insincere,
this type of smile is also referred to as
“The Professional Smile.”
The most studied smile
of all, of course, is the Mona Lisa’s.
If you look at the painting’s right side
it is instantly evident that she has definite
up-turned lips for a smile.
But her eye on this side
does not demonstrate the signs
usually associated with a real smile.
A real smile has laughter lines at
the outer corner of the eyes where
the skin crinkles up. The muscles
involved cannot be easily controlled
consciously and usually activate only
with a real smile.
These muscles also affect the eye lids
and cause them to tense
up with a real smile.
In her case the lower eye lid
does not have the same thickness
and tension as her other eye.
Hence, this eye is very relaxed
and there is no smile evident in this eye.
What makes her so fascinating
is that we are always guessing
about what she is really thinking.
Her eyes and her smile communicate
two entirely different but not
necessarily oppositional emotions.
That’s great if you're a painting.
But not so great if you are striving
to be a "sincere.”
So should you coach a smile out of
a politician if he or she doesn’t
smile naturally?
I don’t think that a coach would
really get very far telling Dick Cheney
to lose the grimace and replace it
with sunshine.
Nor would it be advisable in my opinion.
Stretching that far out of character
is always transparent.
But it’s also not "acceptable"
for a female politician to be caught
pulling “a Cheney.”
Think about it,
how often have you seen
a female politician repeatedly scowl?
It’s variation of emotion
and facial expression that reads
as genuine to an audience.
So paint your speech palate
with contrasting emotional colors
instead of monotone earth tones
and beware of what
Confucius observed:
“I do not want
a friend who smiles when I smile,
who weeps when I weep.
For my shadow in the pool can
do better than that.